NYPD Character Disqualification

NYPD Character Disqualification

Matter of Bassano v Town of Carmel Zoning Board of Appeals
An Article 78 appeal was brought about by petitioner to review a determination by the Town of Carmel Zoning Board of Appeals denying petitioner’s application for an area variance. The Supreme Court granted the petition, annulling the determination and directing the variance and all necessary permits be granted for petitioner to construct a single-family dwelling on the premises. The Town then appealed the decision of the Supreme Court.
The original decision not to grant the variance sought by petitioner had no rational basis. The variance would not negatively alter the character of the neighborhood and the benefit sought was unachievable by any other means. Since there was no foreseeable adverse effect on the neighborhood, the Board’s decision to deny petitioner’s application was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis.
Accordingly, the Court granted the petition, annulled the determination by the Board of Appeals, and directed that the variance and all necessary permits construct a single-family dwelling on the premises be granted.
Matter of Bassano v Town of Carmel Zoning Bd. of Appeals (2008 NY Slip Op 09074) #nypd #disqualified#disqualification #article78 #character #psych #medical #fdny #teacher #newyork #nyc #longisland #call #today #Mineola

Your Career and Future are Worth Fighting For

Call us today at (631) 239-5825, or fill out this form for your FREE appeals case evaluation.

FREE APPEALS CASE EVALUATION

MM slash DD slash YYYY
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Accepted file types: jpg, png, pdf, Max. file size: 50 MB.
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Additional Info

Before You Send Documents

Please do not assume that this office represents you merely because you send us a disqualification letter or other documents. Sending information through this website, by email, or through any upload form does not create an attorney-client relationship. We do not agree to review, monitor, or protect any deadline unless and until we expressly agree to represent you in writing. If time limits apply to your matter, you remain responsible for protecting your rights unless a signed retainer agreement is in place.